WATER PROTECTION STRUCTURE TEMPLATE

BASIC INFORMATION
  1. Name of the structure

    Enter the name or type of the structure, e.g., sedimentation basin, filtration structure, constructed wetland, etc.

    Vegetated swale

  2. Structure description

    Brief general description of the structure, its operating principle, and intended purpose. Is the structure preventing the generation of pollution or managing existing pollution.

    Swales are shallow, broad and vegetated channels designed to convey and retain runoff and remove pollutants. They are used as conveyance structures to pass the runoff to the next stage of the treatment train and can be designed to promote infiltration where soil and groundwater conditions allow.

3. Visual material

Visualize the structure with a diagram or image

https://www.susdrain.org/delivering-suds/using-suds/suds-components/swales-and-conveyance- channels/swales.html

SUITABILITY

4. Suitability for environmental conditions

Impact of soil type, frost susceptibility and erosion sensitivity of soil, slope, category of land use and catchment characteristics on the performance of the structure. Recommended location (Upstream/downstream, terrain location, distance to the water body).

The longitudinal slope of the swale should preferably be 1–3% and at most 5%. In steeper terrain, water should be retained, or the swale should be terraced to manage flow effectively. They should be aligned to avoid sharp bends, as these can cause erosion.

Depending on the soil type, implementation can also include infiltrating or filtering systems.

5. Groundwater protection considerations

Risks of groundwater contamination, suitable groundwater table level.

Unlined swales should not be used to treat runoff from areas with high contaminant loadings if the risk of groundwater pollution due to infiltration is unacceptably high. Where a liner is used to prevent infiltration, the seasonally high groundwater level should be below the level of the liner. If infiltration is allowed, the maximum likely groundwater level should be at least 1 m below the base of the swale.

6. Suitability for winter conditions

Impact of winter conditions, freezing, frost and snow load, on the performance of the structure.

Vegetated swales are typically located along streets or property edges, where they may be used for snow storage during winter. Those intended for snow storage should be designed wide enough so that snow does not need to be piled on the bottom, keeping the flow path open. In spring, swales should be cleared of snow. If the swales are also intended for stormwater infiltration, the bottom soil of the depression must have sufficient permeability. With sufficiently porous soil (permeability coefficient k~1*10⁵), the bottom of the depression will not freeze completely, allowing infiltration to occur even at the beginning of the thawing season. Freezing can also be prevented with drainage.

7. Restricting factors

Factors that restrict the implementation of the structure.

Swales should not be located where extensive areas of trees or overhead structures will cause shade conditions that could limit growth of grass (or other vegetation).

The distance of the swale from buildings should be at least 3 meters.

8. Structure sizing and water management capacity

Land-take, space requirement (surface and underground), length-to-width ratio, size of the catchment area, water volumes to be treated. Water retention efficiency. Overflow structure requirement. Flood risk management allowance for climate change.

Vegetated swale is sized based on flow rate, channel shape, longitudinal slope, and surface material resistance. A sizing calculation is necessary for significant stormwater drainage pathways. The size of the upstream catchment area is recommended to be less than 2 hectares.

The width of the swale can vary significantly. Swales designed to channel small flows may be only about a meter wide, including side slopes, while larger swales intended for stormwater retention or directing water from extensive areas can have a bottom width of up to a couple of meters. Normal maximum swale depth is 400-600 mm.

For effective pollutant removal:

    • The depth of flow should be maintained below the height of vegetation (i.e., usually less than 100 mm).

    • The maximum flow velocity in the swale for such an event should be 0,3 m/s to ensure adequate runoff filtration.

    • The time of travel of runoff along the swale (residence time = length/velocity) should be at least 9 minutes (18 minutes from the top of the swale, if the swale has lateral inflows along its length).

IMPACT AND EFFICIENCY

G. Pollutant removal or prevention efficiency

Types of pollutants the structure retains or prevents from leaching, and their removal efficiency: suspended solids, nutrients, heavy metals, etc.

Vegetated swales improve stormwater quality in multiple ways. They filter coarse and medium-fine sediments and associated pollutants, such as nutrients, oil, and metals, through surface vegetation. Additionally, fine particles and dissolved contaminants are removed via soil and filtration layers, where they are filtered, bound, and partly biodegraded. Vegetation aids in retaining nutrients and dissolved metals through root uptake, while organic pollutants can break down under sunlight exposure or volatilize into the air.

The pollution removal efficiency of vegetated swales varies, influenced by pollutant concentrations and environmental factors. Removal efficiency depends on slope, soil type, infiltration rate, strip length, and vegetation coverage.

Pollution removal efficiency:

Total phosphorus: 30–65 %

Suspended solids and total nitrogen: 0–30 %

Zinc and copper 60% (results vary significantly)

10. Construction load and impact timeline

Construction phase pollution. Timeframe for the impact of water protection methods on water quality.

A vegetated swale begins functioning effectively once its vegetation is fully established. To ensure proper vegetation establishment, swales should not receive runoff until plants are fully grown, preventing rapid siltation. Effective methods include diverting flows until roots are established, using erosion control blankets like jute or straw, and covering bare soil during wet seasons. Freshly seeded areas should be stabilized with erosion control matting or blankets.

11. Impact on soil growth condition in agricultural area

Impact on chemical, physical and biological growth condition.

Not relevant

12. Impact on growth of the forest in forestry area

Impact on chemical, physical and biological growth condition.

Not relevant

13. Combinations

Recommended combinations of structures for effective results.

Swales can be designed with bottom weirs or thresholds to slow down flow and allow stormwater retention within the swale. Additional treatment can be incorporated into swales through retention areas, which receive part of the water flowing through the swale. These retention areas may only store water temporarily, allowing it to return to the swale after peak flow, or they can facilitate infiltration, reducing the overall volume of stormwater.

Water should preferably be directed sideways into the swale rather than single point inflow.

PRECONDITIONS

14. Licensing requirement

Required permits and assessments.

The need for a permit for a vegetated swale depends on its location, size, and environmental impact. Generally, an environmental permit may be required if the swale significantly affects groundwater or the surrounding environment. It is advisable to review local regulations and consult municipal environmental protection authorities for further guidance.

15. Pretreatment

Required/ recommendable pretreatment.

Shallow side slopes or vegetated filter strips at the edge of the impervious surface are useful as a pre-treatment system for runoff entering swales and will improve the water quality performance of the system. There should be a drop of at least 50 mm from the pavement (or hard surface) edge to any vegetated surface to prevent the formation of a sediment lip.

16. Cost-effectiveness

Assessment of investment and maintenance costs in relation to the benefits achieved. Possible impact on income generation. Potential subsidies and fundings.

Estimation of the investment costs:

    • Narrow basin with measurement weirs, width 3 m, depth 0,4 m: 30€/m in soil excavation, 60€/m in rock excavation.

    • Wide basin with soil dams, width 7 m, depth 1 m: 60€/m in soil excavation, 185€/m in rock excavation.

      Estimation of the maintenance costs:

    • Narrow basin: 5€/m per year

    • Wide basin: 10€/m per year

 

17. Maintenance requirements and operational reliability

Level of upkeep needed, reliability under varying conditions, and expected service life.

Maintenance tasks include cleaning the swale, including removal of sand used for gritting, removing debris, repairing shape deformations, cleaning the drainage pipe, clearing discharge pipes, maintaining the overflow route, and managing vegetation.Key maintenance tasks and frequency:

      • Remove litter and debris: Monthly or as needed
      • Cut grass: Monthly during growing season
      • Inspect inlets, outlets, and swale surface: Monthly
      • Monitor vegetation coverage: Monthly for 6 months, then quarterly
      • Reseed bare areas: As needed if >10% of the swale lacks vegetation
      • Repair erosion and relevel surfaces: As required
      • Remove sediment buildup: As needed
ADDITIONAL BENEFITS

18. Potential for multiple co-benefits

List any additional benefits the structure provides besides water protection. These can include flood control, recreation, biodiversity, climate mitigation, or improved aesthetics.

When incorporated into site design, they can enhance the natural landscape, offering both aesthetic and biodiversity benefits.

SUMMARY

1G. Summary table

Structure Name: Vegetated swale

Description / function

Vegetated shallow channels to convey stormwater and filtering pollutants (infiltration possible)

Typical use case

Stormwater management

Environmental suitability

 

Impact on hydrological conditions

Convey, retain, infiltrate

Impact on water quality

Filter and settle out pollutants

Co-benefits

Enhance biodiversity and amenity

Cost-effectiveness

Estimation of the investment costs: 30-185 €/m

Estimation of the maintenance costs: 5-10€/m per year

Pollution removal efficiency:

Total phosphorus: 30–65 %

Suspended solids and total nitrogen: 0–30 % Zinc and copper 60%

Maintenance need

Regular upkeep ensures swale functionality and water quality.

REFERENCES

https://www.susdrain.org/delivering-suds/using-suds/suds-components/swales-and-conveyance- channels/swales.html

https://www.kuntaliitto.fi/julkaisut/2012/1481-hulevesiopas

https://www.scotsnet.org.uk/  data/assets/pdf_file/0023/51764/CIRIA-report-C753-the-SuDS-manual- v6.pdf

https://www.tampere.fi/sites/default/files/2024-06/Hulevesirakenteen_valintakortti.pdf

https://www.stormwaterpa.org/assets/media/BMP_manual/chapter_6/Chapter_6-4-8.pdf